Chinkultic — Structure 1 Chinkultic

MegalithFringe site

Chinkultic

Mexico

Datedc. 201–897 CE

Photo Strongilocentrotus · CC BY-SA 4.0Source file on Wikimedia Commons

Scroll to read

Overview

About this site

What the sources say

Chinkultic, sometimes Chincultic, is a moderate-size archeological ruin in the state of Chiapas, Mexico. It is part of the Lagunas de Montebello National Park.

This pre-Columbian city belongs to the ancient Maya civilization. The city flourished in the Maya Classic Era, from about the 3rd through the 9th century. Most of the sculptures were produced in the last 300 years of this era, with hieroglyphic inscriptions dating from 591 to 897. Post-Classic-Era occupation of the site continued until the 13th century, after which it was abandoned.

The site has some step-pyramids and some 200 smaller buildings, most in undisturbed ruin. Chinkultic has carved stone stelae depicting the site's rulers. The stelae are thought to depict the accession of the rulers as warriors, shown through the shields and spears they carry. Other sites have depictions like this, however they usually focus more on cosmology. In the case of Chinkultic, the focus is all on the rulers as warriors. The site contains a court for playing the Mesoamerican ballgame, which a marker tells us was dedicated on 21 May 591.

Other stelae present at Chinkultic display rulers authority, showing a ruler and then a figure who is clearly subordinate. These stelae depict scattering rituals which are very similar to ones depicted at the sites of Bonampak and Yaxchilan. What makes the figures at Chinkultic different is that they are dressed in long robes with a War Serpent headdress and a necklace of severed heads. This emphasizes the focus on warfare found throughout Chinkultic.

The similarities listed above suggest some sort of artistic communication between Chinkultic and Yaxchilan, however it was not as though Chinkultic copied everything about Yaxchilan stelae. Chinkultic artists mixed the borrowed artistic traditions with their own to create stelae that had similarities but also differences, as is mentioned earlier.

The first published account of the site was made by Edward Seler in the late 19th century. A detailed description of the site was made by Enrique Juan Palacios in 1926.

The first archeological investigations of the site were conducted in 1966 under the direction of Stephan F. de Borhegyi of the Public Museum of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Starting in 1970, some further excavations and restorations of a few buildings was conducted by Mexican government archeologists, who also dredged some artifacts from the site's cenote or natural well known as Agua Azul ("Blue Water"). The cenote gives the site its Maya language name; Chinkultic meaning "stepped-cenote".

The site is open for tourism visits, although it is not one of the more commonly visited Maya sites.

Read on Wikipedia5 min readCC BY-SA 4.0

Age sources

How old this site is, and who says so.

Range across all claimsc. 201–897 CE

Estimated

What this badge meansA reading of this site: what its style says, or a statement published about it.

  • 591–897 CEPublished sourceThe range uses the years explicitly given for the site's hieroglyphic inscriptions.MainstreamHistoricalSource: en.wikipedia.org
  • 201–300 CEWikipedia: Chinkultic (infobox)MainstreamWikipediaSource: en.wikipedia.org

Where it sits in time

The site's dated range, placed against world reference points.

The scale is logarithmic: each step to the left is about ten times older than the last.

591–897 CEHow this date was established: Stated by the sourceEstimated

What this badge meansA reading of this site: what its style says, or a statement published about it.
Source for this date

The full article

Chinkultic: the whole story

5 min read892 wordsRead on Wikipedia

In brief

Sources for this section

Chinkultic, sometimes Chincultic, is a moderate-size archeological ruin in the state of Chiapas, Mexico, within the Lagunas de Montebello National Park. This pre-Columbian city belonged to the ancient Maya civilization and flourished in the Classic Era, from about the 3rd through the 9th century. Post-Classic occupation continued until the 13th century, after which the site was abandoned.

The site has some step-pyramids and some 200 smaller buildings, most in undisturbed ruin. It also has a court for the Mesoamerican ballgame, and a marker records that it was dedicated on 21 May 591. The name comes from the natural well or cenote known as Agua Azul ('Blue Water'), as Chinkultic means 'stepped-cenote'.

Most of the sculptures were produced in the last 300 years of the Classic Era, with hieroglyphic inscriptions dating from 591 to 897. The carved stone stelae depict the site's rulers, thought to show their accession as warriors through the shields and spears they carry. Where other sites usually focus more on cosmology, at Chinkultic the focus is all on the rulers as warriors.

Other stelae show a ruler beside a clearly subordinate figure, in scattering rituals very similar to ones depicted at Bonampak and Yaxchilan. The figures at Chinkultic are dressed in long robes with a War Serpent headdress and a necklace of severed heads. This suggests artistic communication with Yaxchilan, though Chinkultic artists mixed borrowed traditions with their own.

Caitlin C. Earley hypothesizes that the warfare focus indicates a history of conflict with other Maya polities, though which ones is hard to say, since Chinkultic is never mentioned in hieroglyphs in the Usumacinta. This may instead point to a network of art independent from political conflict. Edward Seler gave the first published account in the late 19th century, and Enrique Juan Palacios a detailed description in 1926. Stephan F. de Borhegyi led the first archeological investigations in 1966, and Mexican archeologists excavated and restored some buildings from 1970. The site is open to visitors but is not among the most visited Maya sites.

History and dating

Sources for this section

The stelae found in Chinkultic seem to be focused on warfare and on political control, which Caitlin C. Earley hypothosizes indicates a history of conflict with other Maya polities. Who these polities might have been is hard to say, but because Chinkultic is never mentioned in hieroglyphs in Usumacinta, it is likely they were never directly involved there. What this suggests is that instead of conflict, there might have been a network of art and artistic communication that was independent from political communication and conflict.