MegalithFringe site
Lothal
Also known asAncient site at Lothal
Datedc. 2400–2250 BCE
Photo Rashmi.parab · CC BY-SA 3.0Source file on Wikimedia Commons
Overview
About this site
Overview
Lothal was one of the southernmost sites of the Indus Valley Civilisation, in the Bhal region of the Indian state of Gujarat. Construction of the city is believed to have begun around 2300 BCE, and the catalogue record gives a range of 2350 to 2250 BCE.
The site is near the village of Saragwala in the Dholka Taluka of Ahmedabad district. It is a Monument of National Importance and is on the tentative list of UNESCO. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) regards a basin at the site as one of the world's earliest known docks, an interpretation that other archaeologists dispute.
Read on Wikipedia3 min readCC BY-SA 4.0
Age sources
How old this site is, and who says so.
Range across all claimsc. 2400–2250 BCE
EstimatedWhat this badge means
A reading of this site: what its style says, or a statement published about it.
- 2350–2250 BCEPublished sourceThe starting date reflects the stated belief about when construction began. The source gives one year, so it is shown as a 100-year window (D-08).Source: en.wikipedia.org
- 2300 BCEWikipedia: Lothal (infobox)Source: en.wikipedia.org
- 2400 BCEWikidata inceptionSource: wikidata.org
Where it sits in time
The site's dated range, placed against world reference points.
The scale is logarithmic: each step to the left is about ten times older than the last.
Article
Lothal
Trenches on the northern, eastern and western flanks of the mound revealed the inlet channels and a nullah connecting the dock with the river.
ArchaeologySources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
Sources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
The ASI discovered Lothal in 1954. Excavation began on 13 February 1955 and continued until 19 May 1960. Trenches on the northern, eastern and western flanks of the mound revealed the inlet channels and a nullah connecting the dock with the river. The findings include a mound, a township, a marketplace and the dock. The Archaeological Museum beside the excavated areas displays some of the most prominent collections of Harappan-era antiquities in India.
The site is essentially of a single culture, the Harappan, with an indigenous micaceous Red Ware culture believed to be autochthonous and pre-Harappan. The main city covered 7 hectares (17 acres).
HistorySources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
Sources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
Before the arrival of Harappan people (c. 3000 BCE), Lothal was a small village next to a river giving access to the mainland from the Gulf of Khambhat. A flood destroyed the village foundations and settlements (c. 2350 BCE), and Harappans from Lothal and Sindh then created a planned township on the lines of the greater cities of the Indus valley.
The town was divided into a citadel, or acropolis, and a lower town. The acropolis had houses with paved bathing platforms, drains of kiln-fired brick, a well, and a warehouse with a ramp down to the basin. A north-south arterial street formed the main commercial area of the lower town, with residential areas to either side.
Lothal was a trade centre. Its beads, gemstones, ivory and shells were exported, and the discovery of Persian Gulf seals is cited as evidence of long-distance trade. The ASI links the decline of the town to floods and storms. A powerful flood submerged the town, the acropolis was levelled (2000–1900 BCE), and a massive flood (c. 1900 BCE) is held to have destroyed the town. A much smaller population continued to live at the site without urban influences. The system of weights with an 8.573 gram unit was retained.
InterpretationSources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
Sources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
The ASI considers that the basin was a dock connecting the city to an ancient course of the Sabarmati River on a trade route. The National Institute of Oceanography in Goa found foraminifera, salt and gypsum crystals in the rectangular structure, which indicate that sea water once filled it. Other archaeologists argue that the main city was comparatively small and that the dock was primarily an irrigation tank, and that Khufu's harbour at Wadi al-Jarf in Egypt, dated between 2580 and 2550 BCE, is older.
NameSources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
Sources for this section
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
In Gujarati, Lothal (a combination of Loth and (s)thal) means the mound of the dead. The name of Mohenjo-daro in Sindhi has the same meaning. Villagers in the area had long known of an ancient town and human remains on the mound.
Tradition and region
About this kind of monument
Megalithic burials of India
Megaliths are found in almost every part of South Asia, from the south to the north-eastern hills. Dates in the literature run from before 3000 BCE, with recent finds in southern India claimed back to 5000 BCE, and the southern megalithic cultures correspond in part with the Iron Age. A large fraction are thought to be associated with burial or post-burial rites. The forms are many: stone circles, cists, menhirs, dolmens and rock-cut chambers.
Researchers note that giant human-shaped figures, which usually occur with megalithic monuments in burial grounds, may be connected with ancestor worship, though what they symbolise is unclear. Marks found mostly on potsherds in megalithic burials of central and south India and Sri Lanka, tentatively dated from 1000 BCE to 300 CE, are still debated: there is no consensus on whether they are undeciphered writing or graffiti.
In the east the tradition has lasted longest: the megaliths there show evidence of living megalithic practices until recently. In the Khasi Hills of Meghalaya, Mawphlang ("grassy stone") is one of many settlements named after monoliths, and it is the site of a sacred grove. Visitors should respect local custom.
Dating is the weak point: few have been excavated to modern standards, and many are dated only by comparison with excavated graves.
When visiting, look for rings of stones at the edge of fields, for capstones raised on slabs, and for groups of graves on hillsides.
Paraphrased from Wikipedia: Megalith, Wikipedia: Iron Age in India, Wikipedia: Megalithic graffiti symbols, Wikipedia: Mawphlang · CC BY-SA 4.0
From the article
Dated moments in the story
- 3000 BCE
Before the arrival of Harappan people (c. 3000 BCE), Lothal was a small village next to the river providing access to the mainland from the Gulf of Khambhat.
Source - 2550 BCE
However, this interpretation has been challenged by other archaeologists, who argue Khufu's Red Sea harbour at Wadi al-Jarf (Egypt) is older, dating its construction to between 2580 and 2550 BCE and that Lothal was a comparatively small town, and that the "dock" was primarily an irrigation tank.
Source - 2350 BCE
Harappans began producing the indigenous ceramic goods, adopting the manner from the natives. A flood destroyed village foundations and settlements (c. 2350 BCE).
Source - 2050 BCE
A flood of moderate intensity in 2050 BCE exposed some serious weaknesses in the structure, but the problems were not addressed properly.
Source - 2000 BCE
But the archaeologists also discovered that the practice had been given up by 2000 BCE (determined by the difference in burial times of the carbon-dated remains).
Source - 2000 BCE
When the river changed its course in 2000 BCE, a canal approximately 7 metres (23 feet) wide and 2 kilometres (1.2 miles) long, was dug to the new river course.
Source - 1900 BCE
The acropolis was levelled (2000–1900 BCE), and inhabited by common tradesmen and newly built makeshift houses.
Source - 1900 BCE
A massive flood (c. 1900 BCE) completely destroyed the flagging township in a single stroke.
Source - 1900 BCE
The dock walls were also preserved beyond the great deluge (c.1900 BCE) due to the loam that was deposited by persistent floods.
Source - 1600 BCE
Between 1700 and 1600 BCE, trade would revive again.
Source - 670 CE
Lothal stands 670 kilometers (420 miles) from Mohenjo-daro, which is in Sindh.
Source - 1850
As recently as 1850, boats could sail up to the mound.
Source - 1947
When British India was partitioned in 1947, most Indus sites, including Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, became part of Pakistan.
Source - 1954
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), the official Indian government agency for the preservation of ancient monuments, discovered Lothal in 1954. Excavation work at Lothal commenced on 13 February 1955 and continued until 19 May 1960. According to the ASI, Lothal may have had one of the world's earliest known...
Source
Photographs
6 photographs, each with its author and licence
More photographs
Lore
Evidence & Lore
What the sources actually support — and, kept apart, what has been claimed.
What the evidence supports
Dates
2350–2250 BCEHow this date was established: Stated by the sourceThe starting date reflects the stated belief about when construction began. The source gives one year, so it is shown as a 100-year window (D-08).Source for this date
Measured facts
- Mainstream position
- Contemporary archaeologists reject the irrigation-tank interpretation and regard Lothal as part of a major river system on a trade route, while also identifying floods and storms as important causes of its abandonment.Source: Mainstream position
- Location
- Bhal region of Gujarat, IndiaSource: Location
- Main city area
- 7 hectaresSource: Main city area
- Antiquities
- largest collection in the archaeology of modern IndiaSource: Antiquities
- Nearby river
- about 30 kilometres long according to satellite imagerySource: Nearby river
- Flood destruction
- c. 1900 BCESource: Flood destruction
- Distance to Mohenjo-daro
- 670 kilometersSource: Distance to Mohenjo-daro
- Inception
- 2400s BCESource: Inception
- Heritage designation
- Tentative World Heritage Site, Monument of National Importance, Water Heritage SiteSource: Heritage designation
Alternative claims
Alternative claims about this site, kept in their own block and labelled with where they stand.
Lothal's dock was perhaps an irrigation tank rather than the feature of a large settlement.
Natural catastrophes, specifically floods and storms, caused Lothal's downfall.
Tested: not supportedSource for this claim: Natural catastrophes, specifically floods and storms, caused Lothal's downfall.
Where it stands
India
The pin marks the monument itself — its exact point.
- Coordinates
- 22°31′17″ N, 72°14′58″ EFor a GPS or map app: 22.52139, 72.24944
Access is as our sources describe it; we have not visited the site to check.
Nearby
The closest sites in the Atlas, by straight line.
Sources
Every record behind this page, with the link it came from.
2 sources behind this page
- 01Wikidata Q9443wikidata.org
- 02Fringe claim sourceen.wikipedia.org
Image files
- Archeological Remains at the Lower Town of Lothal.jpgRashmi.parabCC BY-SA 3.0
- Constitution Page181 Rammanohar.jpgAbrsinhaCC BY-SA 4.0
- Closer look of upper site.JPGMv.shahCC BY-SA 3.0
- Crematory at Lothal.JPGAbhilashdvbkCC BY-SA 3.0
- Damping site of Lothal for gutter..JPGMv.shahCC BY-SA 3.0
- Ancient tools excaveted at Lothal (Hammer) 2011-12-05 10.22.03.jpgSanjeev.singh3CC BY-SA 3.0
Report a correctionWrong date, name, photograph or source? Tell us and it will be put right.
Lore, kept apart
Legends and claims
These are stories and claims reported by the sources. They are not evidence, and they never stand in for the dating above.
Credit
Text, licence and sources
Adapted from the Wikipedia article "Lothal" (English), licensed CC BY-SA 4.0; authors are listed in the page history. Reused under CC BY-SA 4.0. Read on Wikipedia · Edit history and authors
- Wikipedia (English): LothalCC BY-SA 4.0
- Wikidata Q9443CC0